USB Network Gate
Remote access to USB devices
Virtual Serial Port Driver
Creation and management of virtual COM ports
FlexiHub
Shared access to personal, team, and corporate devices
Serial to Ethernet Connector
Remote access to COM-port devices
Donglify
Reliable connection to remote USB security dongles
Serial Port Monitor
Reading and recording of serial port data
HelpWire
Remote Support Service
Explore All Solutions
YouTube downloader
Best YouTube downloaders for Mac
Download manager for Mac
Top download managers
Torrent client for Mac
Overview of the best torrent clients
AVI player for Mac
Top apps to enjoy your AVI files
YouTube to MP3 converter
Best YouTube to MP3 converter apps
Music player for Mac
Best music players for macOS
MKV player for Mac
Top MKV players for Mac
FTP client for Mac
Overview of the best FTP client solutions
Explore All Articles
Ivan Korol
Jul 5, 2022
FTP and SFTP servers are often used in home networks to backup and store files. WinSCP is a utility that lets Windows users access an FTP server and manage or transfer files. There’s no WinSCP for Mac, but there are alternatives. Despite their differences, each of these macOS apps is compatible with the FTP protocol.
This stylish, comfortable file browser can mount your FTP disks in Finder - but why use that, when Commander One is better in every way? It’s more than just a WinSCP equivalent for Mac. The built-in mounting feature is supplemented by advanced RegEx searching, dual-pane design, file compression and encryption.
File operations are added to a processing queue, where they can be reviewed or cancelled. If you want to reconfigure any FTP connection - such as logging in with a different username - that can be done at any time. The entire app can be changed according to your preferences, including custom hotkeys.
Pros:
Cons:
Cyberduck is a free, simple WinSCP alternative for macOS. The interface is a single-pane, drag-and-drop-based GUI. Nonetheless, it’s well-made and easy to use. Cyberduck bookmarks are stored as files, and you can open them directly from Finder for a quick connection. Automatic folder syncing is a thing, but there’s also an option to confirm the changes before they are made. Overall, there’s a surprising amount of features to discover in Cyberduck, and its companion app - Cryptomator - only serves to make it more solid.
Pros:
Cons:
FileZilla is an FTP client, as imagined by network admins. The application is as advanced as it is hideous. The layout and the icons make it very difficult to work with as a GUI (naturally, there’s a CLI). But some of its features can’t be found in any other WinSCP equivalent for Mac. And it lets you change many things on the go - things that would usually require you to go into a menu. Almost everything is visible, and the rest can be accessed in the “Site Manager”.
Pros:
Cons:
Fetch is a commercial server access app. Its GUI is unimpressive, but helped by the fact that it’s distributed across multiple windows. It’s an expensive version of WinSCP for Mac, and even if you’re fine with the price tag, the purchase form will easily scare off the casual user with the promise of taxes.
What’s so special about Fetch? Mainly, security. It’s a proxy-compatible, Keychain-compatible app. While this is primarily used by companies, home networks may also benefit from an additional layer of security - and software like Fetch is used for remote access.
Pros:
Cons:
ExpanDrive is pretty, easy to use, and terribly expensive. This may seem strange, until you realize that the app is mainly catered towards workplace use. In order to prevent conflicts, ExpanDrive locks files that are being edited, making them read-only to anyone but the editor. Version management may be useful outside of work, but there are cheaper and better solutions out there, such as Git. Is this WinSCP alternative for Mac worth its price tag? Only if you need the special features.
Pros:
Cons:
It’s worth keeping in mind that some features are obviously unnecessary on a home network, if it’s set up correctly. Proxies are never needed, and file-side data encryption is a bit redundant - the server shouldn’t be accessible from the outside in the first place. These applications can get pretty expensive, and the functionality may come at a cost. Make a rational choice.
Related Articles
